WPC  '&Y.SRA(4KV[>_L?g 11L͠"BC,jҗf !x{7enb9[ .~ĴQ0\i3z-䛟7E3ċa<-~IWFh6&ei p$c@0e:+xzRSBjj<ȎN!GFg¢="*OW 6\@M|20&z gcԄk_fgz<"CB{Ul/{V0j.S7'\uPe.4߮v,D<(űsM;)O^`ulV:;ezXR5z pA\~&=W-Jp-B(7=4gՄ.DIXy,aBߎ2Li8$UB nL %OU 0  0 0- U:  0f #q (2 NZ ^ \ wh 4l  m \  `*Times New RomanTT\  `*Times New RomanTTC\  P6QP\  `*Times New RomanTTXXP\  P6QXP<6X9`("Courier NewTTTTXXx6X@DQX@'   Semtek International, Inc 2 thomast0thomast .   T! :endnote textendnote text            `:footnote reffootnote reference        h:Default ParaDefault Paragraph Font        <6X9`("Courier NewTT3|x (>L$X$XX$XXX$HP LaserJet 5M,,,,0!{z/ h.5_synU  L!X$XX$XXX$  _B.` hp x (#XB   SemtekInternational,Inc.v.LockheedMartinCorporation,etal,CaseNo.97183023/CC  3762,2003MDBT5(CircuitCourtforBaltimoreCity)(February11,2003)(perAlbertJ. x Matricciani,Jr.) @ LockheedfiledanoticeofintentiontorelyonthelawofMassachusettspursuantto XmXXX$'X$XXXm 10   504oftheCourtsandJudicialProceedingsArticle.Semtekfiledamotiontoprecludethe  applicationofMassachusettslaw.Semtekarguedthat(1)Lockheedfailedtoprovide l  reasonablenoticeofanintenttorelyonMassachusettslaw;(2)Lockheedwasjudicially 4  estoppedfromrelyingonMassachusettslaw;and(3)underthelexlocidelectidoctrine,the  L wrongoccurredinMarylandandhenceMarylandlawwouldapply.    Held:JudgmentforLockheed. T   Synopsis:Lockheedprovidedreasonablenoticeasrequiredby XmXXX$'X$XXXm 10504;thusLockheed 4  compliedwiththenoticerequirements.Judicialestoppelisinapplicablebecausethereisno   evidenceofintentionalityorunfairadvantage.Thelexlocidelectidoctrineprovidesthat   thelawofthejurisdictionwheretheinjurywassustainedshouldbeapplied.The H  pecuniaryharmwasfeltinMassachusettsandthusthelawofthatstateapplies. `  0  0` (#(#   Counsel: ` JackD.Lebowitz,Esq.` (#` (#    ` VadiumA.Mzhen,Esq. h    ` AndrewW.Zepeda,Esq. 0    ` LeslieN.Rgizes,Esq. H    ` FrancisB.Burch,Jr.,Esq.     ` AnthonyL.Meagher,Esq.     ` BrettIngerman,Esq. P    ` RobertE.Willett,Esq. h    ` RichardW.Buckner,Esq. 0    ` JessB.Frost,Esq.     ` ThomasV.Girardi,Esq. p    ` WalterK.Lack,Esq. 8    ` StevenC.Shuman,Esq. P Relatedcases:2003MDBT4;2003MDBT8;SemtekInternationalv.Lockheed,No.1930 ! (SeptemberTerm2003)(CourtofSpecialAppeals)