WPC  x:CUM3pr!beZFE,?:CUMַav)):3 ,"tdC ey,5vND9UUYxr\|2Nt(T\?EO,$+OBï=XӨyDy|\v +4r 0< 0<@ 0n|UFUJ00z 0#$UN %3 M9 (= Ne ^ g ws 4w  m \  `&Times New Roman'  Training0Training .   <:Default Para<:Footnote Ref< :Endnote TextXXX7\  `.Times New Roman TURkIA`2WP TypographicSymbols#|x(rq$..       X X HP LaserJet 5M,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular Xy/ h.:i+00U  q!..       X X   _       X<XXXXX<BaltimoreRefuseEnergySystemsCompanyandNortheastMarylandWasteDisposalAuthority  v.BaltimoreGasandElectricCompany,CaseNo.:24C01000234,2003_MDBT_Ԁ6(Circuit  CourtforBaltimoreCity)(May8,2002)(perAlbertJ._Matricciani_,Jr.) | Plaintiffanddefendantassertedclaimsfordeclaratoryreliefandbreachofcontract.Defendant H _BGE_ԀmovedforsummaryjudgmentinCountsIandIIIofthecomplaint,arguingthat(1)the . ~ termsofthecontractwereclearandunambiguous,entitlingittosummaryjudgmentastoCount  d I;and(2)that_BGE_XAEXXX=XXXXAEsappointmentofanotherentity(ConstellationPowerSource)asanagent  J wasanassignmentinviolationofthecontract,entitlingittosummaryjudgmentastoCountIII.  2 _BGE_Ԁargued,inresponse,thatmerelyanagencyagreementwascreated.    Held:PartialsummaryjudgmentdeniedonCountsIandIII.   Synopsis:Theoperativecontract,asmodifiedbythepartiesin1988,wasambiguous.TheCourt `  ruledthatitwouldpermitthepartiestointroduceparolevidenceattrialtoassistthecourtin F  gleaningtheintentionofthepartiesatthetimetheagreementwasmodifiedin1988. ,|   X b  XTheCourtdeniedsummaryjudgmentastoCountIII.Therewasmorethanoneinferencetobe H drawnfromtheevidenceandthecourtwasunabletoconcludeasamatteroflawthatthe . agreementbetween_BGE_ԀandConstellationwasanagencyrelationshiporassignment.