Thursday, January 5, 2006:
 

Bar Admissions
 

No. 64  Victoria Trembow v. Alan Schonfeld

ISSUE - PATERNITY - MAY AN ADULT DISABLED CHILD INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT AFTER HIS EIGHTEENTH BIRTHDAY?

Attorney for Appellant:        Brian D. Wise
Attorney for Appellee:        Cynthia E. Young
 
 

No. 8  Carl Surland v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - WAS EVIDENCE OF THE DEFENDANT'S ASSAULT UPON THE ARRESTING OFFICERS ADMISSIBLE AS SHOWING CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT WITH RESPECT TO THE THEFT OF THE PROPERTY FOR WHICH HE WAS CHARGED?

Attorney for Appellant:        Martha Weisheit
Attorney for Appellee:        Sarah Page Pritzlaff
 
 

No. 45  Stefan Tyson Bell v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - SHOULD AN APPEAL AND INDICTMENT BE DISMISSED WHEN THE DEFENDANT DIES BEFORE HIS DIRECT APPEAL HAS BEEN DECIDED?

Attorney for Appellant:        George E. Burns
Attorney for Appellee:        Sarah Page Pritzlaff
 
 

No. 77  Alan Bruce Chmurny v. State
 
 

No. 52  Georgia-Pacific Corporation et al. v. Elsie L. Benjamin, Individually, etc.

ISSUE - LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - IN ASBESTOS-RELATED WRONGFUL DEATH AND SURVIVAL ACTIONS WHAT FACTORS TRIGGER THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS?

Attorneys for Appellant:        Steven J. Parrott
                                        Laura A. Cellucci
Attorney for Appellee:        Timothy J. Hogan
 
 
 
 

Friday, January 6, 2006:

AG 62  Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Shuan H. M. Rose
(2004 T.)

Attorney for Petitioner:        Dolores O. Ridgell
Attorney for Respondent:        Shuan H. M. Rose
 
 

No. 56  Board of Education of Talbot County, Maryland v. James D. Heister et al.

ISSUE - EDUCATION - IS A PROVISION IN A STATE TEACHER'S CONTRACT ALLOWING FOR FORFEITURE OF A TEACHER'S ACCRUED SALARY FOR VIOLATION OF A CONDITION OF THE CONTRACT UNENFORCEABLE?

Attorney for Appellant:        Doulgas A. Collison
Attorney for Appellee:        James R. Whattam
 
 

No. 54  Orlando Byndloss v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - IN A ROUTINE TRAFFIC STOP DOES A COMPUTER BREAKDOWN ALLOW A POLICE OFFICER TO DETAIN A MOTORIST UNTIL THE COMPUTER WHICH FURNISHES INFORMATION ABOUT THE MOTORIST IS RESTORED TO OPERATION?

Attorney for Appellant:        Amy Brennan
 
 

No. 60  Mayor and Town Council of Oakland v. Mayor and Town Council of Mountain Lake Park et al.

ISSUE - MUNICIPALITIES - DID THE TOWN OF OAKLAND SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON ANNEXATION WITHIN THE TIME LIMITS SPECIFIED UNDER ARTICLE 23A, SEC. 19(d) OF THE MARYLAND CODE?

Attorney for Appellant:        David M. Funk
Attorney for Appellee:        William M. Rudd
 
 
 
 

Monday, January 9, 2006:
 

Misc. 10   In the Matter of the Application of Emsean L. Brown for Admission to the Bar of Maryland
 
 

No. 61  Rite Aid Corporation v. Ellen R. Levy-Gray

ISSUE - CONTRACTS - WHETHER APHARMACY CAN BE HELD LIABLE ON A THEORY OF EXPRESS WARRANTY FOR INFORMATION AND ADVICE FURNISHED WITH A PRESCRIPTION DRUG?

Attorney for Appellant:        Melvin J. Sykes
Attorneys for Appellee:        Loyd Byron Hopkins
                                        Craig J. Franco
 
 

No. 62  Tamere Hassan Thornton v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - (1) WHAT IS THE REQUISITE MENS REA FOR THE GRIEVOUS BODILY HARM FORM OF SECOND DEGREE MURDER?, (2) WAS THE CLAIM OF IMPERFECT SELF-DEFENSE PROPERLY REJECTED?

Attorney for Appellant:        Eve L. Brensike
Attorney for Appellee:        Celia Anderson Davis
 
 

No. 63  In Re: Kaela C., Gunner C., and Franklin C.

ISSUE - FAMILY LAW - IN A CINA PROCEEDING IS A PARENT ENTITLED TO FILE EXCEPTIONS TO A MASTER'S FINDING AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE A CINA PETITION IS DISMISSED?

Attorney for Appellant:        Brian L. Zavin
Attorney for Appellee:        C. J. Messerschmidt
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, January 10, 2006:

No. 55  Robert E. Greenstreet v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - MUST A REVIEWING COURT IN DECIDING UPON THE VALIDITY OF A SEARCH WARRANT ACCEPT AS FACT A CLERICAL ERROR APPARENT ON THE FACE OF THE ACCOMPANYING AFFIDAVIT?

Attorneys for Appellant:        Laura M. Robinson
                                        John H. Robinson, III
Attorney for Appellee:        Devy Patterson Russell
 
 

No. 72  Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase III et al.

ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - DID THE CIRCUIT COURT LACK JURISDICTION TO ENTER JUDGMENTS FORECLOSING THE RIGHT OF REDEMPTION ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES BECAUSE OF FRAUD AND ILLEGALITY?

Attorney for Appellant:        Michael S. Rubenstein
Attorney for Appellee:        Kyriakos P. Marvdas
 
 

No. 57  McKim McKenny Simmons v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - EVIDENCE - WAS EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE WHICH SHOWED THAT THE DEFENDANT'S WIFE INVOKED HER FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE AGAINST THE SELF-INCRIMINATION AS A REASON FOR NOT TESTIFYING?

Attorney for Appellant:        Claudia Cortese
Attorney for Appellee:        Steve Holcomb
 
 

No. 73  Adventist Health Care, Inc. et al. v. Maryland Health Care Commission et al.

ISSUE - HOSPITALS - WAS THE PARTIAL RELOCATION BY A MERGED HOSPITAL SYSTEM OF A CARDIAC SURGERY PROGRAM REQUIRING THE HEALTH CARE COMMISSION TO MAKE A COMPARATIVE REVIEW WITH OTHER APPLICANTS?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

            On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office

no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified.

            After January 10, 2006, the Court will recess until February 2, 2006.