|
HOME | OPINIONS | JOBS | FORMS | FAQs | SITE INDEX | CONTACT US | SEARCH |
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND SCHEDULE
Thursday, March 8, 2007: Bar Admissions AG 39 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Charles Martin Tatelbaum Attorney for Petitioner: James P. Botluck No. 72 Robert A. Sapero v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore ISSUE - EMINENT DOMAIN - WHETHER THE QUICK TAKE CONDEMNATION WAS JUSTIFIED? Attorney for Appellant: Alan R. Engel No. 77 Juwaughn Duvall v. State of Maryland ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - IS A DEFENDANT DENIED EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WHEN THE ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER REPRESENTING HIM CONTENDS THAT THE ACTUAL PERPETRATOR IS A PERSON REPRESENTED BY ANOTHER ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER IN AN UNRELATED CASE? Attorney for Appellant: Brian L. Zavin No. 106 Sheri Jackson v. Pasadena Receivables, Inc. ISSUE - COMMERCIAL LAW - MAY PARTIES IN A PROCEEDING IN A MARYLAND COURT AVOIND APPLYING MARYLAND'S RETAIL CREDIT ACCOUNTS LAW BY AGREEING TO APPLY THE LAW OF ANOTHER STATE? Attorney for Appellant: Ralph T. Byrd No. 87 Michael Hanna, Jr. et al. v. ARE Acquisitions, LLC ISSUE - TRESPASS - MAY A TRESPASS OCCUR WHEN AN ITEM WHICH INTRUDES UPON THE LAND DURING THE ALLEGED TRESPASSER'S LAWFUL POSSESSION REMAINS THERE AFTER THE ALLEGED TRESPASSER DEPARTS? Attorney for Appellant: Thomas Minton Friday, March 9, 2007: Misc. 8 Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender v. The Honorable Edward R. K. Hargadon Attorney for Appellant: Peter Rose No. 88 Motor Vehicle Administration v. Scott H. Shepard ISSUE - MOTORISTS - DID THE POLICE OFFICER WHO STOPPED THE MOTORIST HAVE REASONABLE GROUNDS TO REQUEST A CHEMICAL BREATH TEST? Attorneys for Appellant: Robert C. Cain II and Dore J. Lebowitz No. 98 Alice McNack et al. v. State of Maryland et al. ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - SHOULD MARYLAND RECOGNIZE THE STATE CREATED DANGER DOCTRINE? No. 89 Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Corporation of Maryland v. Frederick Memorial Hospital ISSUE - INSURANCE - WERE MALPRACTICE INSURANCE CLAIMS FILED BY THE INSURED HOSPITAL WITH THE INSOLVENT INSURER "COVERED CLAIMS" UNDER THE MARYLAND INSURANCE CODE? Attorney for Appellant: W. John Vernon Monday, March 12, 2007: AG 14 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Dorsey Evans, Jr. AG 71 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Rex B. Wingerter Attorney for Petitioner: Raymond A. Hein No. 104 Frederick Green v. Carr Lowery Glass Co., Inc. et al. ISSUE - WORKERS' COMPENSATION - IS AN EMPLOYEE WHOSE HEARING IS DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF HIS OCCUPATION ENTITLED TO A HEARING AID PAID FOR BY THE EMPLOYER-INSURER? Attorney for Appellant: David E. Fink No. 86 Derek Williamson v. State of Maryland ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - CAN POLICE OFFICERS WHO ARE ABOUT TO ENTER A HOME TO EXECUTE A SEARCH WARRANT DETAIN A PERSON LEAVING THE HOME? Attorney for Appellant: Stacy McCormack No. 99 Patterson Park Public Charter School, Inc. v. The Baltimore Teachers Union, American Federation of Teachers Local 340, AFL-CIO et al. ISSUE - LABOR LAW - ARE UNIONS NECESSARY PARTIES TO A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING TO MODIFY COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS? Attorney for Appellant: Richard C. Daniels
Tuesday, March 13, 2007: AG 7 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Daniel Q. Mahone Attorney for Petitioner: James P. Botluk No. 101 Manoochehr Arfaa et ux. v. Christopher Martino, d/b/a Do-It-All Construction, Inc. ISSUE - MECHANICS' LIENS - IN A PETITION TO ESTABLISH A MECHANIC'S LIEN WHAT IS REQUIRED TO ADEQUATELY IDENTIFY THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THE LIEN? Attorney for Appellant: Leslie Hayes Russo No. 103 Marcus Dannon Owens v. State of Maryland ISSUE - JURIES - DOES THE PRESENCE ON A JURY OF A NON-CITIZEN FOREIGN NATIONAL VIOLATE THE MARYLAND AND/OR UNITED STATE'S CONSTITUTIONS? Attorneys for Appellant: Peter Rose and Stacy McCormack No. 85 Betty Brown Casey, Trustee v. Mayor and Council of Rockville ISSUE - MUNICIPALITIES - MAY THE MAYOR AND COUNTIL CONSIDER ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY AND FINANCIAL HARDSHIP WHEN REVIEWING PROPERTIES FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION? Attorney for Appellant: Barbara A. Sears On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified. After March 13, 2007, the Court will recess until April 5, 2007. |