Thursday, April 6, 2006:

  Bar Admissions

AG 20  Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Norman Joseph Lee, III

Attorney for Petitioner:        John C. Broderick
Attorney for Respondent:        Norman Joseph Lee, III
 

No. 95  Kalilah Romika Stevenson v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DOES THE MITIGATION DEFENSE OF HOT-BLOODED RESPONSE TO ADEQUATE PROVOCATION APPLY TO THE CRIME OF FIRST DEGREE ASSAULT?

Attorney for Appellant:        Mark Colvin
Attorney for Appellee:        Jeremy M. McCoy
 

No. 93  State Farm Automobile Insurance Company v. Richard Dehaan

ISSUE - INSURANCE - IS THE INSURED ENTITLED TO UNDERSIGNED MOTORIST BENEFITS FOR INJURIES RESULTING FROM A GUNSHOT WOUND?

Attorney for Appellant:        Michael J. Budow
Attorney for Appellee:        Francis J. Ford
 

No. 89  In Re: Maria P.

ISSUE - JUVENILE LAW - MAY A PARENT BE EXCLUDED FROM A CINA PROCEEDING DURING THE CHILD'S TESTIMONY?

Attorneys for Appellant:        Katherine P. Rasin
                                        Julia Doyle Bernhardt
Attorney for Appellee:        Nancy Hopkins
 

No. 90  Lavale Associates, d/b/a Country Club Mall v. Supervisor of Assessments of Allegany County

ISSUE - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - IS THE MARYLAND TAX COURT REQUIRED TO ISSUE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN A WRITTEN DECISION?

Attorney for Appellant:        Joseph S. Kaufman
Attorney for Appellee:        Jeffrey G. Komen
 
 

Friday, April 7, 2006:

No. 94  SDC, 214, LLC.v. London Towne Property Owners Association, Inc. et al.

ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - DOES A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT ALLOWING ONLY FOR EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ON THE PROPERTY "IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE BOARD OF EDUCATION" REQUIRE THE BOARD TO PLAY A ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FACILITIES?

Attorney for Appellant:        James C. Praley
Attorney for Appellee:        Joseph F. Devlin
 

No. 91  Regina Kilmon v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DOES THE CRIME OF RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT OF A PERSON COVER ENDANGERMENT OF A FETUS?

Attorney for Appellant:        Nancy Forster
Attorney for Appellee:        Mary Ann Ince
 

No. 106 Kelly Lynn Cruz v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DIES THE CRIME OF RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT OF A PERSON COVER ENDANGERMENT OF A FETUS?

Attorney for Appellant:        Beth S. Brinkmann
Attorney for Appellee:        Mary Ann Ince
 

No. 97  Ajay Garg v. Deepa Garg

ISSUE - FAMILY LAW - IN A CHILD CUSTODY MATTER MUST A CIRCUIT COURT APPOINT AN ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD BEFORE RESOLVING THE JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE?

Attorneys for Appellant:        Stephen J. Cullen
                                        Jeffrey M. Geller
Attorney for Appellee:        Richard D. Rosenthal
 
 

Monday, April 10, 2006:

No. 99  Todd Lin Chow v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - IS A TEMPORARY TRANSFER OR LOAN OF A FIREARM A TRANSFER OF A FIREARM UNDER ARTICLE 27, SEC. 442 OF THE MD. CODE?

Attorneys for Appellant:        Michael Wein
                                        David Simpson
Attorney for Appellee:        Annabelle L. Lisic
 

No. 98  Logan Hamilton Swift v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DID THE POLICE PROPERLY STOP A PERSON WALKING ALONG A PUBLIC STREET AT 3:00 A.M.?

Attorney for Appellant:        Stacy McCormack
Attorney for Appellee:        Kathryn Grill Graeff
 

No. 104 The Charles County Commissioners, The Office of Sheriff of Charles County Maryland and The State of Maryland v. Anne Marie Johnson et al.

ISSUE- TRANSPORTATION - WERE TRANSPORTATION ARTICLE, SECS. 19-101 AND 102 OF THE MD. CODE IMPLICATED BY THE FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT?

Attorney for Appellant:        John F. Breads, Jr.
Attorney for Appellee:        Douglas P. Desjardins
 
 

Tuesday, April 11, 2006:

No. 92  In Re: Karl H. and Anthony H.

ISSUE - JUVENILE LAW - ARE PERMANENCY PLAN ORDERS PROVIDING FOR REUNIFICATION AND ADOPTION OF THE CHILDREN APPEALABLE?

Attorney for Appellant:        CJ Messerschmidt
Attorney for Appellee:        Martha Weisheit
 

No. 87  James A. Thompson v. State of Maryland

Attorney for Appellant:        George E. Burns, Jr.
Attorney for Appellee:        Kathryn Grill Graeff
 

No. 63  In Re: Kaela C., Gunner C., and Franklin C.

ISSUE - FAMILY LAW - IN A CINA PROCEEDING IS A PARENT ENTITLED TO FILE EXCEPTIONS TO A MASTER'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BEFORE A CINA PETITION IS DISMISSED?

Attorney for Appellant:        Brian Zavin
Attorney for Appellee:        CJ Messerschmidt
 

No. 67  Diana Knight v. Princess Builders, Inc. et al.

ISSUE - CIVIL PROCEDURE - DID THE CIRCUIT COURT LACK SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN RESPONDENT'S APPEAL FROM THE ORPHANS' COURT DECISION?

Attorney for Appellant:        Brian G. West
Attorneys for Appellee:        Jonathan M. Wall
                                        David R. Forrer
 
 
 
 

                  On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office

no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified.

                  After April 11, 2006, the Court will recess until May 3, 2006.