SCHEDULE
Wednesday, May 3, 2006:
Bar Admissions
No. 110 Warren Thompson v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - SHOULD JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON FLIGHT OF THE DEFENDANT AS EVIDENCE OF GUILT BE DISALLOWED IN CRIMINAL CASES?
Attorney for Appellant:
Brian Saccenti
Attorney for Appellee:
Gregory D'Alesandro
No. 88 George E. Blake v. State of Maryland
Attorney for Appellant:
Michael R. Malloy
Attorney for Appellee:
Kathryn Grill Graeff
No. 111 Zachary Shawn Fowler v. Motor Vehicle Administration
ISSUE - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - IN A DRIVER LICENSE SUSPENSION HEARING MUST A HEARSAY WITNESS REQUESTED BY THE LICENSEE BE PRODUCED WHERE THERE IS A DISPUTE ON A GENUINE ISSUE OF FACT?
Attorney for Appellant:
Leonard Stamm
Attorney for Appellee:
Robert C. Cain, II
No. 96 David Louis Toth v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - TRAFFIC OFFENSES - MAY A CIRUICT COURT JUDGE INCREASE A PRESET TRAFFIC OFFENSE FINE?
Attorney for Appellant:
Peter Ayers Wimbrow, III
Attorney for Appellee:
Celia Anderson Davis
No. 109 Kevin C. Alston v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DID THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY IMPOSE A SENTENCE OF FIVE (5) YEARS WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE UNDER ART. 27, SEC. 449(e)?
Attorney for Appellant:
Amy Brennan
Attorney for Appellee:
Celia Anderson Davis
Thursday, May 4, 2006:
AG 71
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Rex B. Wingerter
No. 113 James Jeandell v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - IS MARYLAND'S SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION STATUTORY SCHEME UNCONSTITUTIONALLY VAGUE AS APPLIED TO HOMELESS OFFENDERS?
Attorneys for Appellant:
Julia Doyle Bernhardt
Katherine P. Rasin
Attorney for Appellee:
Steve Holcomb
No. 112 Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. Kathleen Anderson
ISSUE - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - WAS THE COMMISSION ENTITLED TO APPEAL THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING BOARD'S DECISION UNDER EITHER LEOBR OR THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT?
Attorney for Appellant:
William C. Dickerson
Attorney for Appellee:
Michael Marshall
No. 103 State of Maryland v. Charles Phillip Williams
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - WAS THE DEFENDANT'S GUILT AS AN ACCOMPLICE TO AN ATTEMPTED ARMED ROBBERY INCONSISTENT WITH HIS ACQUITTAL OF WEARING, CARRYING AND TRANSPORTING A HANDGUN?
Attorney for Appellant:
Mary Ann Ince
Attorney for Appellee:
Stacy McCormack
No. 102 Michael Jerome Bryant v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - EVIDENCE - ARE AN INMATES STATEMENTS TO A NURSE ABOUT HIS MENTAL HEALTH OR EMOTIONAL STATE ADMISSIBLE AT TRIAL?
Attorney for Appellant:
Stephen B. Mercer
Attorney for Appellee:
Kathryn Grill Graeff
Monday, May 8, 2006:
No. 107 Vernon Evans, Jr. v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DEATH PENALTY APPEAL
Attorneys for Appellant:
A. Stephen Hut, Jr.
Julie S. Dietrich
Attorney for Appellee:
Annabelle L. Lisic
No. 124 Vernon Evans, Jr. v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DEATH PENALTY APPEAL
Attorney for Appellant:
Julie Dietrich
Attorney for Appellee:
Annabelle L. Lisic
No. 123 Vernon Evans, Jr. v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DEATH PENALTY APPEAL
Attorney for Appellant:
A. Stephen Hut, Jr.
Attorney for Appellee:
Annabelle L. Lisic
No. 122 Vernon Evans, Jr. et al.. v. Mary Ann Saar, Secretary et al.
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DEATH PENALTY APPEAL
Attorney for Appellant:
Todd C. Zubler
Attorneys for Appellee:
Scott S. Oakley
Michael O. Doyle
Tuesday, May 9, 2006:
No. 105 Donald Marcell Rivers Sr. v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - WAS THE EVIDENCE SUFFICIENT TO CONVICT THE DEFENDANT OF DISTRIBUTING A NON-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE UNDER CRIMINAL LAW ARTICLE, SEC. 5-618?
Attorney for Appellant:
George Burns
Attorney for Appellee:
Diane E. Keller
No. 118 Cynthia Campbell v. Amir Bolourian et al.
ISSUE - APPEALS - DOES AN APPELLATE COURT HAVE JURISDICTION TO REVIEW A CIRCUIT COURT'S ORDER UNDER THE COLLATERAL ORDER DOCTRINE?
Attorney for Appellant:
Richard Mosier
Attorneys for Appellee:
John M. Quinn
Leslie K. Ridgway
No. 114 Raymond Alan Curtin v. State of Maryland
ISSUE - JURIES - IS IT PROPER TO ASK PROSPECTIVE JURORS IF THEY HAVE ANY BIAS ON THE SUBJECT OF GUNS?
Attorney for Appellant:
Jennifer Lyman
Attorney for Appellee:
Sarah Page Pritzlaff
On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office
no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified.
After May 9, 2006, the Court will recess until May 31, 2006.