|
HOME | OPINIONS | JOBS | FORMS | FAQs | SITE INDEX | CONTACT US | SEARCH |
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND SCHEDULE
Wednesday, May 30, 2007: Misc. 16 In the Matter of the Application of Michael F. Connolly for Admission to the Bar of Maryland
Attorney for Petitioner: Fletcher P. Thompson No. 120 Carol Gazunis et al. v. Amelia R. Foster et vir. ISSUE - EMPLOYMENT - MAY AN EMPLOYER REFUSE TO ARBITRATE AN EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE WHICH WAS NOT TIMELY FILED? Attorney for Appellant: Patricia P. Via No. 139 State of Maryland v. David Allen Testerman ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - MAY AN APPELLATE COURT UPON DIRECT REVIEW DETERMINE THAT DEFENSE COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE BECAUSE HE ALLOWED A LESSER CHARGE TO GO TO THE JURY? Attorney for Appellant: Robert Taylor, Jr. No. 122 Janice M. v. Margaret K. ISSUE - FAMILY LAW - WHAT STANDARDS APPLY IN DETERMINING WHETHER A "DE FACTO" PARENT IS ENTITLED TO VISITATION? Attorney for Appellant: Cynthia E. Young Thursday, May 31, 2007: No. 82 Douglas S. Arey v. State of Maryland ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - IN A POST CONVICTION PROCEEDING DID THE HEARING JUDGE PROPERLY RULE ON THE POTENTIAL USE OF DNA EVIDENCE? Attorney for Appellant: John L. Kopolow No. 141 Louise M. Bubb et al. v. Jean S. Laws, Special Administrator of the Estate of Howard R. Masimore ISSUE - CIVIL PROCEDURE - WHAT PROCEDURE MUST A PARTY FOLLOW IN ASSERTING A FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE IN A CIVIL SUIT? Attorney for Appellant: Charles Bagley, IV Attorney for Appellant: Byron Warnken
Attorney for Petitioner: Raymond A. Hein
Monday, June 4, 2007: No. 142 Andrew Bednar et al. v. Provident Bank of Maryland ISSUE - COMMERCIAL LAW - MAY CLOSING COSTS BE ASSESSED AGAINST A CONSUMER BORROWER WHO FULLY PREPAYS A SECOND MORTGAGE LOAN? Attorneys for Appellant: M. Albert Figinski and John Pica AG 25 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Anthony Alex Saridakis Attorney for Petitioner: Fletcher P. Thompson
No. 140 Darrell Holmes a/k/a Lendro Thomas v. State of Maryland ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - MAY A DEFENDANT WHO ENTERS A GUILTY PLEA ON A CRIMINAL CHARGE LATER CHALLENGE THE CONVICTION IN A CORAM NOBIS PETITION? Attorney for Appellant: Allison Pierce No. 143 Robert J. Dvorak et al. v. Anne Arundel County Ethics Commission ISSUE - COUNTIES - BASED ON A VIOLATION OF REPEALED LAWS MAY THE COUNTY ETHICS COMMISSION RESTRICT THE CONDUCT OF FORMER COUNTY EMPLOYEES IN PENDING LITIGATION? Attorney for Appellant: Phillip F. Scheibe
Tuesday, June 5, 2007: AG 34 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Robert Allen Sapero Attorney for Petitioner: Glen M. Grossman AG 83 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Hekyong Pak Attorney for Petitioner: Dolores O. Ridgell No. 126 Diamond Point Plaza Limited Partnership et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Trustee ISSUE - CONTRACTS - IN A BREACH OF CONTRACT ACTION MUST THE NON-BREACHING PARTY SHOW THAT ALLEGED MISREPRESENTATIONS WERE THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF LOSS OR DAMAGE? Attorney for Appellant: K. Donald Proctor ISSUE - CONTRACTS - WAS THE SEVEN MILE "RADIUS RESTRICTION" CONTAINED IN A COMMERCIAL LEASE VIOLATED BY SAM'S SLUB? Attorney for Appellant: Donald A. Rea On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified. After June 5, 2007, the Court will recess until September 6, 2007.
|