|
HOME | OPINIONS | JOBS | FORMS | FAQs | SITE INDEX | CONTACT US | SEARCH |
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND SCHEDULE Tuesday, October 2, 2007:
Attorney for Petitioner: Dolores O. Ridgell ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - IF A WOMAN DURING SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITHDRAWS CONSENT BUT IS FORCED TO CONTINUE AGAINST HER WILL IS SHE A VICTIM OF RAPE? Attorney for Appellant: Sarah Page Pritzlaff No. 18 Michael D. Stachowski v. Sysco Food Services of Baltimore, Inc. et al. ISSUE - WORKERS' COMPENSATION - WHAT IS THE PROPER TRIGGERING DATE OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS GOVERNING THE REOPENING OF A WORKERS' COMPENSATION CASE? Attorney for Appellant: Wm. O'Brien Finch, Jr. No. 15 Robert Lee Myer v. State of Maryland ISSUE - WAS TAPED TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY IMPROPERLY ADMITTED BECAUSE THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT PERMITTED TO CROSS-EXAMINE THE DECLARANT-VICTIM? Attorney for Appellant: Cynthia E. Young ISSUE - MARYLAND STATE ETHICS LAW - WHETHER ENFORCEMENT OF MARYLAND STATE ETHICS LAWS MAY BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY TO AN AGREEMENT WHICH WAS EXECUTED TWO MONTHS BEFORE THE STATUTE WAS ENACTED? Attorney for Appellant: Timothy Maloney
Bar Admissions No. 34 Edgar A. Bowen, Jr. et al. v. City of Annapolis ISSUE - IS RETIREE ENTITLED TO HAVE PENSION INCREASED BY SAME PERCENTAGE AS PAY SCALE INCREASES GRANTED TO ACTIVE MEMBERS OF POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS WHO HAD SAME RANK AND YEARS OF SERVICE AS RETIREE? Attorney for Appellant: Robert E. Deso No. 16 Jaron Tyree Grade v. State of Maryland ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - WAS IT ERROR FOR A COURT TO DISMISS A JUROR WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFYING COUNSEL OF THE JUROR COMMUNICATION AND PERMITTING COUNSEL TO RESPOND? Attorney for Appellant: George Burns No. 17 Mark Barbre v. Andrew Pope, III *** Andrew Pope, III v. Mark Barbre ISSUE - MARYLAND TORT CLAIMS ACT (MTCA) - MAY THE MTCA'S NOTICE REQUIREMENT BE PROPERLY CIRCUMVENTED BY PLEADING MALICE OR GROSS NEGLIGENCE IN A SUIT FILED FIVE YEARS AFTER THE INJURY? Attorney for Appellant: John F. Breads, Jr. No. 27 In Re: Kevin E. ISSUE - JUVENILE - WAS A SECOND ADJUDICATION OF A JUVENILE PETITION OF DELINQUENCY BARRED BY DOUBLE JEOPARDY PRINCIPLES WHEN FIRST ADJUDICATION THE STATE WAS DENIED A POSTPONEMENT, RESTED AFTER PUTTING ON NO EVIDENCE, THE COURT RECOMMENDED THE PETITION BE DISMISSED? Attorney for Appellant: Deborah Richardson Tuesday, October 9, 2007: AG 55 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Victor Mba-Jonas Attorney for Petitioner: Gail D. Kessler No. 20 Montgomery County, Maryland v. Glenmont Hills Associates Privacy World At Glenmont Metro Centre ISSUE - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - UNDER THE FEDERAL PREEMPTION DOCTRINE OR FEDERAL SPENDING CLAUSE MAY THE COUNTY BE PRECLUDED FROM PROHIBITING HOUSING DISCRIMINATION BASED UPON THE SOURCE OF INCOME? Attorney for Appellant: Edward B. Lattner No. 19 Lawrence Price, Jr. v. State of Maryland *** State of Maryland v. Lawrence Price, Jr. ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - IS CONVICTION FOR POSSESSION OF A HANDGUN IN CONNECTION WITH DRUG TRAFFICKING PROPER WHERE THE DEFENDANT IS ACQUITTED OF THE DRUG TRAFFICKING CHARGES? Attorney for Appellant: Michael R. Malloy
No. 4 Kathleen Hill v. Cross Country Settlements, LLC ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - MAY A LENDER FORECLOSE AGAINST A PROPERTY TO RECOVER MONEY DUE UNDER A MORTGAGE WHERE THE LENDER HAD PREVIOUSLY RELIED UPON THE SETTLEMENT COMPANY'S MISTAKEN REPRESENTATIONS THAT NO BALANCE WAS DUE UNDER THE MORTGAGE? Attorney for Appellant: Jeffrey L. Forman Wednesday, October 10, 2007: AG 13 & 64 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Peter R. Maignan Attorney for Petitioner: Glenn M. Grossman No. 22 Anthony Lanzaron et ux. v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland et al. ISSUE - ZONING - MAY THE TIME DEADLINE FOR IMPLEMENTING PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED VARIANCES AND A SPECIAL EXCEPTION BE EXTENDED? Attorney for Appellant: John W. Butler ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - WHETHER PRETRIAL DISCOVERY IS ALLOWED IN DISTRICT COURT IN BREACH OF LEASE ACTIONS? Attorney for Appellant: Theodosia Saffo No. 25 Mark Anderson et al. v. General Casualty Insurance Company f/k/a Southern Guaranty Insurance Company et al. ISSUE - INSURANCE - DOES NOTICE TO THE INSURANCE AGENT COMPLY WITH THE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 27-601 OF THE MD CONN ANN., WHEN STATUTE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRES NOTICE TO THE INSURED OF A PROPOSED CANCELLATION? Attorney for Appellant: Peter Ayers Wilmbrow, III
On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified. After October 10, 2007, the Court will recess until November 1, 2007.
ALEXANDER L. CUMMINGS
|