Thursday, November 2, 2006:

Bar Admissions

No. 71 Nikos Stanford Liddy v. Linda H. Lamone, et al.

AG 19 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Marie Elena Klarman

Attorney for Petitioner: Marianne J. Lee
Attorney for Respondent: Marie Elena Klarman

Misc. 1 Laboratory Corporation of America et al. v. Karen Hood et al.

Attorney for Appellant: Bruce R. Parker
Attorney for Appellee: E. Dale Adkins, III

No. 34 Saturio Grogrieo Fields v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - EVIDENCE - WAS THE DISPLAY OF THE DEFENDANT'S NICKNAME ON A BOWLING ALLEY TELEVISION MONITOR ADMISSIBLE NON-HEARSAY TO PROVE HIS PRESENCE AT THE BOWLING ALLEY AT THE TIME OF THE SHOOTINGS?

Attorney for Appellant: Michael R. Malloy
Attorney for Appellee: Diane E. Keller

No. 32 David A. Bramble, Inc. v. Merrill F. Thomas et ux.

ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - MAY A HOLDER OF A RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL ON A PROPERTY EXERCISE THAT RIGHT IF HE FAILS TO INCLUDE A NON-PRICE PURPORTEDLY IMMATERIAL TERM IN THE OFFER?

Attorney for Appellant: R. Stewart Barroll
Attorney for Appellee: Stephen H. Kehoe

No. 36 Terry Haley a/k/a Antoine Haley v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - EVIDENCE - DOES THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE EXTEND TO INFORMATION WHICH THE DEFENDANT PROVIDES HIS ATTORNEY AND WHICH LATER FORMS THE BASIS OF THE DEFENDANT'S DEFENSE?

Attorneys for Appellant: Allison Sayers and Stacy McCormack
Attorney for Appellee: Brian Kleinbord

Friday, November 3, 2006:

No. 37 Terrance Parker v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DID THE SEIZURE OF EVIDENCE BY THE POLICE FOLLOWING EXECUTION OF A "NO KNOCK" SEARCH WARRANT VIOLATE MARYLAND AND FEDERAL LAW?

Attorney for Appellant: Allison E. Pierce
Attorney for Appellee: Jeremy M. McCoy

No. 33 Eastside Vend Distributors, Inc. v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.

ISSUE - ANTITRUST LAW - IS A SELLER OF GOODS GUILTY OF PRICE DISCRIMINATION IF HE SELLS A PRODUCT TO ONE PURCHASER AT A SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER PRICE THAN HE CHARGES THE PURCHASER'S COMPETITION?

Attorney for Appellant: Benjamin Rosenberg
Attorney for Appellee: James P. Ulwick

No. 30 Ronald Boyd a/k/a Randall Boyd v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - IN A PROSECUTION FOR VIOLATION OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER IS THE APPLICATION FOR THE ORDER WHICH INCLUDES ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT RELEVANT OR ADMISSIBLE TO SHOW "CONTEXT"?

Attorney for Appellant: Julia Doyle Bernhardt
Attorney for Appellee: Shannon Avery

No. 35 Glen Koshko et ux. v. John Haining et ux.

ISSUE - FAMILY LAW - WERE THE GRANDPARENTS ENTITLED TO VISITATION WITH THE GRANDCHILDREN?

Attorney for Appellant: Peter T. McDowell
Attorney for Appellee: Stephen Kleeman

Monday, November 6, 2006:

No. 42 George Junior Spry v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - WAS THE EVIDENCE SUFFIECIENT TO SHOW THAT THE DEFENDANT WILLFULLY FAILED TO OBEY A POLICE ORDER TO LEAVE THE SCENE?

Attorney for Appellant: George E. Burns, Jr.
Attorney for Appellee: Gary O'Connor

No. 41 J. P. Delphey Limited Partnership v. Mayor and City of Frederick

ISSUE - MUNICIPALITIES - DID THE CITY COUNCIL VIOLATE MARYLAND LAW BY CONDEMNING REAL PROPERTY AT A CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION?

Attorney for Appellant: Sterling G. Mead
Attorney for Appellee: Christopher J. Heffernan

No. 24 Kevin Tremaine Stoddard v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - EXPUNGEMENT OF RECORDS - MAY EXPUNGEMENT OF PART OF A CRIMINAL INDICTMENT BE DENIED BECAUSE ALL THE COUNTS OF THE INDICTMENT PURPORTEDLY WERE ONE CRIMINAL UNIT?

Attorney for Appellant: Michael E. Henderson
Attorney for Appellee: Sarah Page Pritzlaff

No. 28 Richard A. Mundey v. Erie Insurance Group et al.

ISSUE - INSURANCE - IS A LIMITATION ON COVERAGE OF "RESIDENT" FAMILY MEMBERS INVALID BECAUSE IT IS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE STATUTES?

Attorney for Appellant: Michael J. Schremer
Attorney for Appellee: Anne K. Howard

Wednesday, November 8, 2006:

No. 27 Charles R. Dashiell, Jr. et al. v. Charles E. Meeks, Jr.

ISSUE - APPEALS - MAY AN APPELLATE COURT CONSIDER PART OF THE RECORD WHICH IT ORDERED AND SUPPLEMENTED INTO THE RECORD?

Attorney for Appellant: Alvin I. Frederick
Attorneys for Appellee: James Macalister and Morton Edelstein

No. 23 Legacy Funding LLC v. Edward S. Cohn, Substitute Trustees et al.

ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - IS THE FORECLOSURE SALE PURCHASER ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR ALLOWING THE FORMER OWNER TO REMAIN IN POSSESSION OF THE FORECLOSED PROPERTY UNTIL THE PURCHASER OBTAINS POSSESSION?

Attorney for Appellant: Byron L. Huffman
Attorney for Appellee: Richard Rosenblatt

No. 25 Legacy Funding LLC v. Howard N. Bierman, Substitute Trustees et al.

ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - IS THE FORECLOSURE SALE PURCHASER ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR ALLOWING THE FORMER OWNER TO REMAIN IN POSSESSION OF THE FORECLOSED PROPERTY UNTIL THE PURCHASER OBTAINS POSSESSION?

Attorney for Appellant: Byron L. Huffman

No. 26 Legacy Funding LLC v. Thomas P. Dore, Substitute Trustees et al.

ISSUE - REAL PROPERTY - IS THE FORECLOSURE SALE PURCHASER ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR ALLOWING THE FORMER OWNER TO REMAIN IN POSSESSION OF THE FORECLOSED PROPERTY UNTIL THE PURCHASER OBTAINS POSSESSION?

Attorney for Appellant: Byron L. Huffman

On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office

no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified.

After November 8, 2006, the Court will recess until November 30, 2006.

ALEXANDER L. CUMMINGS
CLERK