SCHEDULE

Thursday, November 30, 2006:

Bar Admissions

AG 59 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Kenneth Stanford Ward
(2005 T.)

Attorney for Petitioner: Glenn M. Grossman
Attorney for Respondent: Kenneth Stanford Ward

Misc. 2 Erie Insurance Exchange v. Edmund D. Heffernan II et al.

Attorney for Appellant: Charles E. Wilson, Jr.
Attorneys for Appellee: Andrew Janquito and Samuel H. Paavola

No. 39 Artavius Donnell Cox v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - WAS THE ENCOUNTER BETWEEN THE POLICE OFFICERS AND DEFENDANT CONSENSUAL AND, THUS, NOT A FOURTH AMENDMENT STOP?

Attorney for Appellant: Steven Holcomb
Attorney for Appellee: Allison Pierce

No. 40 Storetrax.Com, Inc. v. Joshua Gurland

ISSUE - CORPORATIONS - DID THE CORPORATE DIRECTOR BREACH HIS FIDUCIARY DUTIES TO THE INSOLVENT CORPORATION?

Attorney for Appellant: Ron Early
Attorney for Appellee: Thomas D. Murphy

No. 47 Department of Health and Mental Hygiene v. Anthony Kelly

ISSUE - MENTAL HEALTH - MUST AN INVOLUNTARY PSYCHIATRIC PATIENT BE A DANGER TO HIMSELF OR TO THE PERSON OR PROPERTY OF OTHERS INSIDE THE FACILITY BEFORE HE CAN BE FORCIBLY MEDICATED?

Attorney for Appellant: Kathleen A. Ellis
Attorneys for Appellee: Suzanne Sangree and Laura Cain

Friday, December 1, 2006:

AG 49 Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Natalie H. Rees
(2005 T.)

Attorney for Petitioner: Raymond A. Hein
Attorney for Respondent: Natalie H. Rees

No. 52 Centre Insurance Company, Z.C. Sterling Insurance Company v. J.T.W.

ISSUE - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - WHEN DOES THE PERIOD FOR APPEALING AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION TO THE CIRCUIT COURT BEGIN TO RUN?

Attorneys for Appellant: Harold A. MacLaughlin anf J. Van Lear Dorsey
Attorney for Appellee: James T. Walker

No. 56 James T. Walker v. Centre Insurance Company et al.

ISSUE - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - WHEN DOES THE PERIOD FOR APPEALING AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION TO THE CIRCUIT COURT BEGIN TO RUN?

Attorney for Appellant: James T. Walker
Attorneys for Appellee: Harold A. MacLaughlin and J. Van Lear Dorsey

No. 43 Rebecca Cochran et al. v. Eileen W. Norkunas

ISSUE - CONTRACTS - IN A REAL ESTATE TRANSATION DID A LETTER OF INTENT AND SUBSEQUENT PACKAGE OF DOCUMENTS BOTH SIGNED BY THE SELLER CONSTITUTE SINGLY OR COLLECTIVELY A BINDING ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT?

Attorney for Appellant: James L. Mayer
Attorney for Appellee: John Moffett

Monday, December 4, 2006:

No. 44 Frank Conaway et al. v. Gitanjali Deane et al.

ISSUE - MARYLAND CONSTITUTION - DOES MARYLAND LAW PROHIBIT THE MARRIAGE OF TWO PERSONS OF THE SAME GENDER?

Attorneys for Appellant: Robert Zarnoch and Steven M. Sullivan
Attorney for Appellee: Ken Choe

Misc. No. 5 In the Matter of the Application of Roderick M. Chavez for Admissionnto the Bar of Maryland

Attorney for Appellant: Bobby Henry, Jr.

No. 29 David Reier v. Department of Assessments and Taxation

ISSUE - STATE PERSONNEL - DOES AN AWARD TO A WRONGFULLY TERMINATED EMPLOYEE OF "FULL BACK PAY" INCLUDE RESTORATION OF LOST BENEFITS UNDER THE RELEVANT STATUTES?

Attorney for Appellant: Hillary Galloway Davis
Attorney for Appellee: David M. Lyon

No. 49 River Walk Apartments, LLC et al. v. Roger Twigg et al.

ISSUE - MUNICIPALITIES - MAY A MUNICIPALITY CONTRACT TO PURCHASE RIGHT-OF-WAYS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE A PRE-EXISTING BUILDING PROJECT WITHOUT SEEKING LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL BY ORDINANCE?

Attorney for Appellant: Jeffrey H. Scherr
Attorney for Appellee: Kurt J. Fischer

Tuesday, December 5, 2006:

No. 48 Sylvia B. Piven et al. v. Comcast Corporation et al.

ISSUE - CIVIL PROCEDURE - MAY LANDOWNERS IN DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS FILE A CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AGAINST VARIOUS DEFENDANTS FOR ALLEGED TRESPASS?

Attorneys for Appellant: Charles J. Piven and Marshall N. Perkins
Attorney for Appellee: Adam Caldwell

No. 51 Randy Paul Brown, Jr. v. State of Maryland

ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THE POLICE DETAIN A PERSON WHO KNOCKS ON THE DOOR OF A HOUSE AN HOUR AFTER THE POLICE ENTER PURSUANT TO SEARCH WARRANT?

Attorney for Appellant: Brian M. Saccenti
Attorney for Appellee: Kathryn Grill Graeff

No. 50 Mikhail Volodarsky v. Kira Tarachanskaya

ISSUE - FAMILY LAW - IN A CUSTODY OR VISITATION PROCEEDING WHAT IS THE STANDARD OF PROOF NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH PARENTAL NEGLECT OR ABUSE?

Attorney for Appellant: John J. Condliffe
Attorneys for Appellee: John Carroll Broderick and Nicole E. Ames

No. 54 Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. et al. v. Robin D. Grove

ISSUE - EVIDENCE - MAY A TRIAL COURT IN ITS DISCRETION ORDER EXPANDED IN CAMERA REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS PROTECTED BY THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE?

Attorney for Appellant: Paul Raschke
Attorney for Appellee: Daniel Clements

On the day of argument, counsel are instructed to register in the Clerk’s Office

no later than 9:30 a.m. unless otherwise notified.

After December 5, 2006, the Court will recess until January 4, 2007.

ALEXANDER L. CUMMINGS
CLERK