| September 2010 Schedule |
| Date |
Docket # |
Title |
| 09-02-10 |
Ag 36 (2009 t.) |
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Walter Carroll Elliott, Jr. |
| 09-02-10 |
No. 1 |
Robert Harvey Bishop, Jr. v. State of Maryland
Issues - Criminal Law - (1) where the parties have proceeded by way of an agreed statement of facts, may an appellate court rely on evidence that was proffered by the state but disputed by the defense in determining that the improper denial of a motion to suppress is harmless error? (2) did the lower court err in holding that the improper denial of the motion to suppress petitioner’s confession to the police is harmless error? |
| 09-02-10 |
No. 11 |
Eugene Edward Gardner v. State of Maryland
Issue - Criminal Law - is trial court bound by the original trial judge’s sentence or a subsequent sentence imposed by three-judge panel where retrial and conviction follow successful appeal and Cts. & Jud. Proc. Art. Section 12-702(b) prohibits a court from imposing a sentence more severe than the sentence previously imposed except in certain circumstances? |
| 09-02-10 |
No. 6 |
Norman Bruce Derr v. State of Maryland
Issues - Criminal Law - whether appellant’s federal and state constitutional rights of confrontation were violated when the state was permitted to introduce: (1) the opinion by a serology examiner through the testimony of an expert who did not participate either directly or in a supervisory capacity in the serological testing without calling the serology examiner as a witness or showing that the examiner was unavailable and that appellant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the examiner? (2) the results of dna testing of biological evidence through the testimony of an expert who did not participate either directly or in a supervisory capacity in the dna testing without calling the dna analyst who performed the testing as a witness or showing that the analyst was unavailable and appellant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the analyst? |
| 09-01-10 |
Bar Admissions |
|
| 09-01-10 |
Ag 8 (2009 t.) |
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Saladin Eric Shakir |
| 09-01-10 |
No. 7 |
Ahmed M. Ali v. Cit Technology Financing Services, Inc.
Issue - Constitutional Law - Statute of Limitations - whether the lower court erred when it upheld the trial court’s decision which held that the statute of limitations on respondent’s claim had not expired at the time the instant complaint was filed? |
| 09-01-10 |
No. 3 |
Dale Albert Crispino, III v. State of Maryland
Issues - Criminal Law - (1) did the trial court err by refusing to give a jury instruction requiring unanimity on the specific act on which it was basing its guilty verdict? (2) did the trial court err by refusing to instruct the jury that it had to find that the criminal acts took place within the time frame set forth in the indictment? |
| 09-01-10 |
No. 12 |
Alexander H. Neustadter, et al. V. Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring, Inc.
Issue - Constitutional Law - whether petitioner’s right to religious freedom was violated when court required trial to proceed in the absence of petitioner and his counsel over course of two days that petitioner’s jewish orthodox faith required him to strictly observe as days of worship?
|
| 09-01-10 |
No. 4 |
William Briscoe v. State of Maryland
Issue - Criminal Law - did the lower court correctly hold that the police lawfully seized a handgun from petitioner’s vehicle during a valid inventory search? |
