WPC jT>YRE*:e+J.F>2Z}f4?| P'bӁsx5!~yK^ `+W+&:ܽpt=$7U܏Ć̽XѐjPm=5ⲅ2?s#[X^N>h+jC'YItؚ9="Ww0UWiJ2l2^*ROzݾOizꊗ<Sй>j|YKhBdy{Mdt0MHk4'o}"oȉP#[R:+jCQ*Y=)3 .sU}w̥hol-`(!EU7PF9:MQij q~ w:6 9>B lfXJ^Y86sPY@mCUĽqU. %nN 0(w4 m#^ <6X9`(CourierX3|x<6X9`(CourierXx6X@`7X@($}R1 le{UHP LaserJet 5/5M PostScript03    !  _  OYATTORNEYGRIEVANCECOMMISSION    *Inthe  Ѐ OFMARYLAND    h      l     `     h     *CourtofAppeals 6     ` Petitioner h       P    `     h     *ofMaryland     v.   `     h            `     h     *Misc.DocketAG  ^   STUARTM.BLUM h    (x     `     h     *No.30 B     ` Respondent h           `     h     *SeptemberTerm,2005   ̀ ORDER  4   TheCourthavingconsideredthemotiontoamendthedisbarment j orderor,inthealternativetosuspendtheSeptember2,2005 N reinstatementofMarylandRule16760(d)(2)topermitfurther  investigationandrequestforemergencyrelieffiledintheabove &v case,itisthis8thdayofAugust,2005,     ORDERED,bytheCourtofAppealsofMaryland,thatBarCounsel 2! shall,onorbeforeAugust22,2005,fileananswertothemotion v # whichshallincludethereindatareflectingthenumberofdisbarred  "Z% attorneyspresentlyworkingas_paralegals_Ԁandalsodatadisclosing #' theextenttowhichotherStatesprohibitorrestrictdisbarred 2% ) attorneysfromworkingas_paralegals_,anditisfurther &"+   ORDEREDthat,onorbeforeAugust30,2005,theattorneyfor )>%/ StuartM.BlummayfilearesponsetoBarCounselsanswerwhich +&1 mayincludedataonthematterstobeprovidedbyBarCounsels -f(3 responsetothemotion,anditisfurther .)5 OY      ORDEREDthat,onTuesday,September6,2005,theparties D shallappearbeforetheCourtatahearingtopresentoralargument ( withrespecttothemotion,anditisfurther l    ORDEREDthattheOrderofthisCourtdatedJune2,2005    reinstating,asofSeptember2,2005,theoperationofMaryland (x  Rule16760(d)(2),whichprohibitsadisbarredattorney,inter   alia,fromworkingasaparalegalforanattorney,isstayed,and P  MarylandRule16760(d)(2)shallcontinuetobesuspendedpending 4 theoutcomeofthehearinginthiscase. x       `     h     /s/RobertM.Bell________     `     h      p CHIEFJUDGE      `     h